[rael-science] Programmable Nanoparticles Improve Chemotherapy's Aim

วันเสาร์ที่ 14 เมษายน พ.ศ. 2555

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org   
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Source: http://news.sciencemag.org/sciencenow/2012/04/programmable-nanoparticles-impro.html?ref=hp

Programmable Nanoparticles Improve Chemotherapy's Aim

by Robert F. Service on 4 April 2012
sn-nanoparticles.jpg
The Right Mix. Novel nanoparticles contain a polymer core (red) that traps an anticancer compound (green) that are together shrouded by another polymer (blue) and a molecule to target prostate cancer cells (purple).
Credit: J. Hrkach et al., Science Translational Medicine, 4 (4 April 2012)
Chemotherapy drugs are like a shotgun. Even though doctors are just aiming for tumors, the compounds hit a variety of other places in the body, leading to side effects like bone marrow damage and hair loss. To improve their aim, researchers have tried to package these drugs inside tiny hollow nano-sized containers that can be directed toward tumors and bypass healthy tissues. But the size, shape, and makeup of these "nanoparticles" can drastically affect where and when they are taken up. Now, scientists have surveyed the landscape of some 100 different nanoparticle formulations and shown that when a conventional chemotherapeutic drug is packaged inside the best of these nanoparticles, it proves considerably more effective at fighting prostate cancer in animals than the drug alone.
The new results aren't the first to show the promise of nanoparticle therapeutics against cancer. Nearly a dozen of these tiny drug carriers are already in clinical trials. But researchers are still struggling to sort out the size and makeup of nanoparticles that work best for ferrying drugs to tumors. So for their current study, a team of 30 researchers led by chemical engineer Robert Langer at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in Cambridge, physician-scientist Omid Farokhzad of Harvard Medical School, and biochemical engineer Stephen Zale of BIND Biosciences in Cambridge, Massachusetts, decided to take a more systematic approach.
Rather than looking at all types of biomaterials from which to make their particles, the researchers started with six different materials already approved for use by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, as well as an already-approved anticancer cargo compound called docetaxel. They then varied 10 different factors, including the size of the particles in which they trapped docetaxel, the density of chemical groups used to shroud the particles from the immune system, additional surface compounds used to target the particles to tumor cells of interest, the amount of docetaxel they carried, and how fast the particles decomposed and released their cargo.
After a preliminary evaluation of more than 100 different nanoparticle drug formulations, Langer and his colleagues settled on a design containing 100-nanometer particles made from a combination of a biodegradable polymer known as PLA and a coating of PEG, another polymer that readily binds water molecules and helps hide the particles from the immune system. Some of the PEG chains were also capped with copies of a small molecule called ACUPA that binds to receptor molecules overexpressed on the surface of prostate cancer cells.
Tests on mice, rats, and monkeys showed that delivering docetaxel in nanoparticles produced plasma concentrations of the drug over a 24-hour period 100 times as high as standard docetaxel injections did; 10 times as much of the drug accumulated in tumors, as well. And in an early clinical safety trial on 17 people, the researchers found drug accumulation in tumors and clinical effects at doses as low as 20% of the normally prescribed docetaxel dose, as they report online today in ScienceTranslational Medicine. Additional clinical trials are now testing increased doses, and no new toxicities have been observed to date.
"It's an important result, and a terrific direction to go in," says Joseph DeSimone, a chemist and nanoparticle drug expert at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. The study shows that delivering drugs inside nanoparticles has the potential to improve the effectiveness of many conventional cancer drugs and other therapeutics that are limited by their side effects, he says: "When you change where drugs deposit, you fundamentally change the outcome."



-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Ethics" is simply a last-gasp attempt by deist conservatives and
orthodox dogmatics to keep humanity in ignorance and obscurantism,
through the well tried fermentation of fear, the fear of science and
new technologies.
 
There is nothing glorious about what our ancestors call history, 
it is simply a succession of mistakes, intolerances and violations.
 
On the contrary, let us embrace Science and the new technologies
unfettered, for it is these which will liberate mankind from the
myth of god, and free us from our age old fears, from disease,
death and the sweat of labour.
 
Rael
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Tell your friends that they can subscribe to this list by sending an email to:
subscribe@rael-science.org
- - -
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
unsubscribe@rael-science.org
- - -

0 ความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น

Copyright Text

WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to
believe that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when
I select articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-semitic,
anti-Jewish, racist, revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group
or religion, or any other stupid article, it does not mean that I
support them. It just means that it is important for all human beings
to know about them. Common sense, which is usually very good among our
readers, is good enough to understand that. When, like in the recent
articles on drug decriminalization, it is necessary to make it
clearer, I add a comment, which in this case was very clear: I support
decriminalizing all drugs, as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad
people (as only depressed and sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin
their life with a criminal record. That does not mean that there is
any change to the Message which says clearly that we must not use any
drug except for medical purposes. The same applies to the freedom of
expression which must be absolute. That does not mean again of course
that I agree with anti-Jews, antisemites, racists of any kind or
anti-Raelians. But by knowing your enemies or the enemies of your
values, you are better equipped to fight them. With love and respect
of course, and with the wonderful sentence of the French philosopher
Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to
the death your right to say it".