[rael-science] WHO Coverup Of Fukushima Radiation Is Unscientific Hogwash

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

http://www.rense.com/general95/whocoverup.html

WHO Coverup Of Fukushima Radiation Is Unscientific Hogwash By Yoichi Shimatsu World Exclusive To Rense.com 5-24-12

The recently released report titled "Preliminary Dose Estimation from the nuclear accident after the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunamii" is a clumsy attempt by the World Health Organization to downplay the public-health catastrophe hitting the Japanese people and stalking the world population. To the many skeptics who have already experienced WHO malfeasance, please bear with this brief response to yet another scandalous cover-up from the Geneva-based international agency. The 122-page WHO report is a classic example of data manipulation - reliance on biased studies, dismissal of contrary evidence and faulty logic - further weighed down by reams of irrelevant text that insurance agents call "boilerplate". Buried deep in the report - though it should be buried six-feet deep  - are the expert panel's conclusions: "It can be concluded that the estimated effective doses outside Japan from the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident are below (and often far below) the dose levels regarded by the international radiological protection community as very small." "It can also be concluded that low effective doses are estimated in much of Japan. " "In the Fukushima prefecture and in neighbouring prefectures the estimated effective  doses are below the internationally agreed reference level for public exposure due to radon in dwellings (annual effective dose of about 10 mSv ). Thus, according to the warped logic from the WHO, a person living inside a house in Colorado or Kyushu is more threatened by radiation exposure from radon gas in their basement than residents of Fukushima are from reactor meltdowns. It should be noted that on the same day of the report's release, the U.N. Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation stated that none of the Fukushima nuclear workers' deaths were caused by radiation exposure. It is implausible that the WHO experts could leap so blindly - not just stumble - into every pitfall laid by the Japanese government's spin-doctoring of the Fukushima public health disaster. The report is not just a compendium of minor errors; it amounts to a scandalous cover-up arising from the health industry's lucrative connections to the nuclear industry. Huge profits are made from radiation treatment of cancer with isotopes produced inside nuclear reactors, even if this brutal form of "therapy" is hardly more effective than a witch doctor's incantations. The gross flaws in the WHO report include: -  acceptance of skewed data on radiation levels in food from testing centers affiliated with the Japanese government, without inclusion of studies by independent laboratories outside of Japan. No questions are raised about the suppression of findings of high-level contamination or of selective tissue samples from only the least -affected parts of vegetables, fruits, grains, meat and fish. - unquestioning acceptance of bogus data under the Japanese government's system of so-called averaged-out radiation readings, which are diluted and ignore the actual range of measurements from low areas to hot spots, which can be up to 1,000 times higher. - reference to thyroid studies done on Fukushima children taken after the half-life expiration of iodine-131 following the March 15 explosions. - categorical dismissal of any quantitative readings of radiation levels in drinking water, based on  dubious government measurements without any consideration of the variable factor of snow melt from fallout-affected watersheds. - reliance on the British system of computer modeling of atmospheric dispersal of isotopes, which excludes analysis of concentrated contamination via heat-column interaction with the high-altitude jet stream (which has long since opened an Arctic ozone hole). - assumption that sea dumping of nuclear material is harmless except for contamination of the fish catch in the immediate marine environs of the Fukushima coast, without concern for spawning areas and long-term contamination of marine feed stocks, including algae and plankton. The WHO catalog of falsification is easily taken apart line-by-line in every section, although the summary above should suffice to relegate it to the medical fraud file.The modeling and selective data used by the WHO are so fundamentally flawed that the only logical deduction is that its experts are simply apologists for nuclear power - actually it is far worse than apologetics since the so-called experts are agents-in-place for the nuclear industry. A cursory glance at the qualifications of just a few members of the Expert Panel indicates close ties with the nuclear industry. - Jane Simmonds, chair: U.K. Health Protection Agency, in reality with the National Radiation Protection Board, which is notoriously allied with the nuclear power industry - Stephanie Haywood, rapporteur, University of Hull, Center for Adaptive Science - Lynn Anspaugh, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory - Mikhail Bolonov, Soviet-era radiobiologist, perpetrated the Chernobyl cover-up - Carl Blackburn, U.S. expert on irradiation for the food industry - Shin Saigusa, Japan National Institute for Radiation Safety, formerly with Fukushima University - Ichiro Yamaguchi, head of the Yamagata testing station who stated that Tohoku residents faced only very low doses of radiation .- Philippe Verrger, WHO, French expert on irradiation for the European food industry. Not a single critic of the nuclear industry was appointed to the expert committee, nor radiologists or cancer specialists from private research hospitals. None of the hot-spot readings by the Japanese citizen movements were taken into account or even given mention. It is no coincidence that stooges of Britain's nuclear industry led this panel, since the U.K. was the first nation to support postwar Prime Minister Nobusuke Kishi's quest for nuclear-bomb production. Hippocratic Code violated An agreement between the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the WHO, signed in May 1959, gave veto power to the nuclear authority over any decisions related to radiation damage made by World Health officials, which explains with its flunkies control the Fukushima study. The Hippocratic Code has thus been replaced by an unspoken deal by medical hypocrites. The Fukushima whitewash adds to the WHO list of crimes against humanity, from its collaboration with major pharmaceutical companies in dubious vaccine campaigns in developing countries, the refusal to link new pathogens to over-dependance on vaccines and antibiotics in humans and animals, rejection of the efficacy of herbal therapy until late into the anti-malaria campaign, its botched response to avian influenza and the hysteria-driven travel ban imposed on Hong Kong during so-called "SARS epidemic"(when no travel advisory was issued on the far higher threat in northern Japan following the Fukushima meltdowns). Given such a dismal record of fraud and failure, it becomes clear that the World Health Organization cannot be reformed. The WHO is a country club for medical malpractitioners, and as such it should be abolished. Its Fukushima hogwash is the last straw. Author: Yoichi Shimatsu organized health-consulting seminars by a Hong Kong-based medical science team during the SARS and avian influenza outbreaks, whose recommendations have been widely adopted by Asia's food industry and hospital systems

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to believe
that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when I select
articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish, racist,
revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group or religion, or any
other stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It just
means that it is important for all human beings to know about them.
Common sense, which is usually very good among our readers, is good
enough to understand that. When, like in the recent articles on drug
decriminalization, it is necessary to make it clearer, I add a comment,
which in this case was very clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs,
as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad people (as only depressed and
sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin their life with a criminal
record. That does not mean that there is any change to the Message which
says clearly that we must not use any drug except for medical purposes.
The same applies to the freedom of expression which must be absolute.
That does not mean again of course that I agree with anti-Jews,
anti-Semites, racists of any kind or anti-Raelians. But by knowing your
enemies or the enemies of your values, you are better equipped to fight
them. With love and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence
of the French philosopher Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you
say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".

-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Ethics" is simply a last-gasp attempt by deist conservatives and
orthodox dogmatics to keep humanity in ignorance and obscurantism,
through the well tried fermentation of fear, the fear of science and
new technologies.
 
There is nothing glorious about what our ancestors call history, 
it is simply a succession of mistakes, intolerances and violations.
 
On the contrary, let us embrace Science and the new technologies
unfettered, for it is these which will liberate mankind from the
myth of god, and free us from our age old fears, from disease,
death and the sweat of labour.
 
Rael
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Tell your friends that they can subscribe to this list by sending an email to:
subscribe@rael-science.org
- - -
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
unsubscribe@rael-science.org
- - -