[rael-science] Molecules 'too dangerous for nature' kill cancer cells

วันพุธที่ 31 ตุลาคม พ.ศ. 2555

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org   
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Source: http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22424-molecules-too-dangerous-for-nature-kill-cancer-cells.html

Molecules 'too dangerous for nature' kill cancer cells

THAT which nature abhors could help combat cancer, say researchers who've developed and tested weird compounds called nullomers. Their name comes from the Latin word "nullus" for nothing, and the fact that although they can theoretically exist naturally, they don't, possibly because they're too toxic or useless to life, and so the DNA sequences that encode them have been evolved out of existence.
Now, two nullomers have been shown to kill cells of two common types of cancer – breast and prostate – as well as a form of leukaemia. Yet they seem to spare healthy cells, which rapidly become immune to any ill effects. "To our surprise, the normal cells adapt and become less sensitive to the nullomers, whereas the effects on cancer cells increase with time," says Greg Hampikian of Boise State University in Boise, Idaho, and head of the team developing and testing the nullomers. He thinks they might work by depleting energy production in cancerous but not healthy cells, but his investigations into how they kill cells are ongoing.
Hampikian made nullomers after analysing all publicly available genomes of living things, then working out which DNA sequences coding for peptides five amino acids long were absent from nature's inventory. He discovered that of 3.2 million combinations possible for such peptides, 198 were absent. Then, he set about making those peptides.
After screening them, he identified two, codenamed 9R and 9S1, that were particularly effective against cancer cells. The results, published in Peptides (DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.09.015), show that within two days, cancer cells became more sensitive to the nullomers, whereas healthy cells became more resistant.

Even more potent

The concentrations required to kill half a population of prostate or breast cancer cells dropped within 48 hours to as little as a third of the original level, whereas healthy skin and blood cells grew tolerant to the nullomers.
Further investigations showed that the nullomers killed the cancer cells by disrupting energy production in mitochondria, the powerhouses of cells, their output of the energy molecule ATP dropping practically to zero. Hampikian is now investigating this in more detail to find out why nullomers damage cancerous cells but spare healthy ones. "There are so many basic differences between cancer and normal cells, everything from how fast they reproduce to how they metabolise sugar, so we're working on some of those variables now," he says.
Hampikian and his colleagues are altering nullomers chemically to try to make them even more effective. "We expect a big increase in potency," he says. However, he doubts they could combat cancer alone, and envisions use in combination with other drugs to reduce the chance that cancer cells will develop resistance to them.
The work gets a cautious welcome from Ali Tavassoli, a cancer researcher at the University of Southampton: "These findings are promising, but it's important to stress that they've only been tested on cells in the lab. Further studies of how these peptides might behave in humans, especially their stability and resistance to degradation, are needed before we know if they could be suitable drug candidates."
Journal reference: Peptides DOI: 10.1016/j.peptides.2012.09.015


-- 
-- 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"Ethics" is simply a last-gasp attempt by deist conservatives and
orthodox dogmatics to keep humanity in ignorance and obscurantism,
through the well tried fermentation of fear, the fear of science and
new technologies.
 
There is nothing glorious about what our ancestors call history, 
it is simply a succession of mistakes, intolerances and violations.
 
On the contrary, let us embrace Science and the new technologies
unfettered, for it is these which will liberate mankind from the
myth of god, and free us from our age old fears, from disease,
death and the sweat of labour.
 
Rael
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
 
Tell your friends that they can subscribe to this list by sending an email to:
subscribe@rael-science.org
- - -
To unsubscribe, send an email to:
unsubscribe@rael-science.org
- - -
 

0 ความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น

Copyright Text

WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to
believe that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when
I select articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-semitic,
anti-Jewish, racist, revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group
or religion, or any other stupid article, it does not mean that I
support them. It just means that it is important for all human beings
to know about them. Common sense, which is usually very good among our
readers, is good enough to understand that. When, like in the recent
articles on drug decriminalization, it is necessary to make it
clearer, I add a comment, which in this case was very clear: I support
decriminalizing all drugs, as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad
people (as only depressed and sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin
their life with a criminal record. That does not mean that there is
any change to the Message which says clearly that we must not use any
drug except for medical purposes. The same applies to the freedom of
expression which must be absolute. That does not mean again of course
that I agree with anti-Jews, antisemites, racists of any kind or
anti-Raelians. But by knowing your enemies or the enemies of your
values, you are better equipped to fight them. With love and respect
of course, and with the wonderful sentence of the French philosopher
Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to
the death your right to say it".