[rael-science] Outrage as Egypt plans 'farewell intercourse law' so husbands can have sex with DEAD wives up to six hours after their death

วันอาทิตย์ที่ 6 พฤษภาคม พ.ศ. 2555

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The Raelian Movement
for those who are not afraid of the future : http://www.rael.org
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~



Outrage as Egypt plans 'farewell intercourse law' so husbands can have sex with DEAD wives up to six hours after their death


PUBLISHED: 09:28 GMT, 26 April 2012 UPDATED: 06:48 GMT, 27 April 2012
E

Egyptian husbands will soon be legally allowed to have sex with their dead wives for up to six hours after their death, local media reports.

The controversial new law is claimed to be part of a raft of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament.

It will also see the minimum age of marriage lowered to 14 and the ridding of women's rights of getting education and employment.

Controversial: The 'farewell intercourse' law is part of a raft of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament

Controversial: The 'farewell intercourse' law is part of a raft of measures being introduced by the Islamist-dominated parliament

Egypt's National Council for Women is reportedly campaigning against the changes, saying that 'marginalising and undermining the status of women would negatively affect the country's human development'.

Dr Mervat al-Talawi, head of the NCW, wrote to the Egyptian People’s Assembly Speaker Dr Saad al-Katatni addressing her concerns.

Egyptian journalist Amro Abdul Samea reported in the al-Ahram newspaper that Talawi complained about the legislations which are being introduced under 'alleged religious interpretations'.
 
    The subject of a husband having sex with his dead wife arose in May 2011 when Moroccan cleric Zamzami Abdul Bari said marriage remains valid even after death.

    He also said that women have the right to have sex with her dead husband, alarabiya.net reported.

    It seems the topic, which has sparked outrage, has now been picked up on by Egypt's politicians.

    Outrage: Egyptian husbands could soon have sex with their dead wives if a new law is approved (file picture)

    Outrage: Egyptian husbands could soon have sex with their dead wives if a new law is approved (file picture)

    TV anchor Jaber al-Qarmouty slammed the notion of letting a husband have sex with his wife after her death under the so-called 'Farewell Intercourse' draft law.

    He said: 'This is very serious. Could the panel that will draft the Egyptian constitution possibly discuss such issues? Did Abdul Samea see by his own eyes the text of the message sent by Talawi to Katatni?

    'This is unbelievable. It is a catastrophe to give the husband such a right! Has the Islamic trend reached that far? Is there really a draft law in this regard? Are there people thinking in this manner?'

    Although reported in local media, there are some suggestions from within Egypt that the plans do not exist and were merely seeded by journalists loyal to ousted President Hosni Mubarak.

    Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2135434/Outrage-Egypt-plans-farewell-intercourse-law-husbands-sex-dead-wives-hours-AFTER-death.html#ixzz1tEOAB9sw


    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
    full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
    mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
    means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
    know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
    completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
    in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
    for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to believe
    that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when I select
    articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-Semitic, anti-Jewish, racist,
    revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group or religion, or any
    other stupid article, it does not mean that I support them. It just
    means that it is important for all human beings to know about them.
    Common sense, which is usually very good among our readers, is good
    enough to understand that. When, like in the recent articles on drug
    decriminalization, it is necessary to make it clearer, I add a comment,
    which in this case was very clear: I support decriminalizing all drugs,
    as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad people (as only depressed and
    sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin their life with a criminal
    record. That does not mean that there is any change to the Message which
    says clearly that we must not use any drug except for medical purposes.
    The same applies to the freedom of expression which must be absolute.
    That does not mean again of course that I agree with anti-Jews,
    anti-Semites, racists of any kind or anti-Raelians. But by knowing your
    enemies or the enemies of your values, you are better equipped to fight
    them. With love and respect of course, and with the wonderful sentence
    of the French philosopher Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you
    say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it".
    -- 
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    "Ethics" is simply a last-gasp attempt by deist conservatives and
    orthodox dogmatics to keep humanity in ignorance and obscurantism,
    through the well tried fermentation of fear, the fear of science and
    new technologies.
     
    There is nothing glorious about what our ancestors call history, 
    it is simply a succession of mistakes, intolerances and violations.
     
    On the contrary, let us embrace Science and the new technologies
    unfettered, for it is these which will liberate mankind from the
    myth of god, and free us from our age old fears, from disease,
    death and the sweat of labour.
     
    Rael
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
     
    Tell your friends that they can subscribe to this list by sending an email to:
    subscribe@rael-science.org
    - - -
    To unsubscribe, send an email to:
    unsubscribe@rael-science.org
    - - -

    0 ความคิดเห็น:

    แสดงความคิดเห็น

    Copyright Text

    WARNING FROM RAEL: For those who don't use their intelligence at its
    full capacity, the label "selected by RAEL" on some articles does not
    mean that I agree with their content or support it. "Selected by RAEL"
    means that I believe it is important for the people of this planet to
    know about what people think or do, even when what they think or do is
    completely stupid and against our philosophy. When I selected articles
    in the past about stupid Christian fundamentalists in America praying
    for rain, I am sure no Rael-Science reader was stupid enough to
    believe that I was supporting praying to change the weather. So, when
    I select articles which are in favor of drugs, anti-semitic,
    anti-Jewish, racist, revisionist, or inciting hatred against any group
    or religion, or any other stupid article, it does not mean that I
    support them. It just means that it is important for all human beings
    to know about them. Common sense, which is usually very good among our
    readers, is good enough to understand that. When, like in the recent
    articles on drug decriminalization, it is necessary to make it
    clearer, I add a comment, which in this case was very clear: I support
    decriminalizing all drugs, as it is stupid to throw depressed and sad
    people (as only depressed and sad people use drugs) in prison and ruin
    their life with a criminal record. That does not mean that there is
    any change to the Message which says clearly that we must not use any
    drug except for medical purposes. The same applies to the freedom of
    expression which must be absolute. That does not mean again of course
    that I agree with anti-Jews, antisemites, racists of any kind or
    anti-Raelians. But by knowing your enemies or the enemies of your
    values, you are better equipped to fight them. With love and respect
    of course, and with the wonderful sentence of the French philosopher
    Voltaire in mind: "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to
    the death your right to say it".